Miriam English wrote:
> We have some very smart people here. *Surely* we can think up a better
> solution than sending millions of people to their deaths. If we can defuse
> this situation and let the terrorists be their own undoing somehow, surely
> that is a vastly superior win than blood-soaked revenge. War is long and
> dirty, and in this case I am not convinced it is even winnable. There has
> to be a better way.
What "millions of people"? Sending in ground troops to get rid
of the terrorists does not require any such death toll. That we
take action does not make it "blood-soaked revenge".
War is a nasty business and I am sure all of us here would
prefer a good alternative. But it is not true that there "has
to be a better way." In this case, there may well not be a
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:48 MDT