Re: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of public security)

From: J. R. Molloy (
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 01:34:09 MDT

From: "Zero Powers" <>
> To the extent that the question was rhetorical, I suppose you could say it
> was "insincere" or "disengenuous," but it was not mean-spirited. It was
> just an attempt to show why I take issue with your suggestion that poor
> parents should have their kids taken away.

I didn't write "poor parents," I wrote "deadbeat parents," IOW, unfit parents,
which means that they brought children into the world without having the
ability to properly care for them, which indicates negligence and
irresponsibility. Note that.

--J. R.

Useless hypotheses, etc.:
 consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, Cyc, Eliza, cryonics, individual
uniqueness, ego

     Everything that can happen has already happened, not just once,
     but an infinite number of times, and will continue to do so forever.
     (Everything that can happen = more than anyone can imagine.)

We won't move into a better future until we debunk religiosity, the most
regressive force now operating in society.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:18 MDT