From: "Mike Lorrey" <email@example.com>
> Olga Bourlin wrote:
> > Good grief, what an insufferably elitist viewpoint. Understanding how
> > science works or being familiar with its macro-concepts is not beyond
> > intellectual skills of people who "pound nails all their lives." One
> > doesn't have to be a chemist in order to appreciate the integrity of the
> > scientific method. Scientists are not the only people with critical
> > thinking skills in our society. Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" series did not
> > primarily to scientists. Science needs more and better PR, and
> > not the perpetuation of myths like "science is too complicated to
> > dumb-asses like y'all ..."
> Projecting again?
I don't recall projecting the first time, so I'm definitely not projecting
"again" (and what did I write that could be considered a projection?).
> I recall in high school physics, where of the 35 people in the room, the
> only two people that ever seemed to get the subject matter completely
> were the teacher and myself. Often I wound up trying to translate and
> analogize concepts for people when the teacher had exhausted their
Admirable. But I was not saying lay people need to understand physics or
chemistry or any other branch of science the way people involved in those
subjects intimately would need to understand them.
> I don't think its impossible to teach nail pounders about science, but
> the vast majority of them *have absolutely no interest* in it. By the
> middle of high school, they are pretty much set on nail pounding as a
> career (or the equivalent) and are of the opinion that "I'll never use
> this in real life". So long as their pappy was able to make a go of life
> without an education, they really don't see a point in it.
I've learned that people who work for their leisure often have interesting
hidden talents and pastimes. They are not what they "do" - in fact, hardly
I've learned people are often not what they "do" in life, in
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:14 MDT