Re: SciAm: nano and cryonics

From: Eugene Leitl (
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 11:17:44 MDT

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 wrote:

> (Of course, even most of us signed up for cryonics aren't doing
> anything about it either, and we are the ones who are most likely to
> have to face consequences eventually for our inaction.)

As long as cryonics stays a religion, there will be no science in it.
Associating with apparent wackos is one of the surest ways to ruin a
scientific career. Merely having signed up doesn't make you automatically
belong to the solution set, in fact, arguably lots of vocal but misguided
activists are hurting the case.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:10 MDT