From: Mike Lorrey <mlorrey@datamann.com>
>>Joe dees:
>> I also appreciate Mike's removing this discussion to its proper
>>venue on exi-freedom.
Too bad you're the only one who ignores the lists better interests.
>Well, since you seem to think it's okay to keep discussing it, I
>will (see what happens when you insist on having the last word?).
>Dr. Emerson, who is the plaintiff in US v. Emerson did not do what
>you claim he did. His separated wife, months after he caught her
>and her boyfriend in bed together and allegedly threatened them
>(which is what created their divorce proceedings), saw fit to
>perform some sort of sitdown strike in his office: she wouldn't
>leave his place of business and was interfering with his patients.
>He ordered her to leave, and when she wouldn't, he called the
>police and pulled a gun on her to restrain her until the police
>arrived. His daughter was never around.
>Furthermore, her claims about his 'threats' remained
>unsubstantiated and were never examined in court, he was never
>afforded his due process rights, when the judge unilaterally
>issued a restraining order.
>Dr. Emerson has never been charged with domestic abuse of any
>sort, does not have a criminal record, while his wife has a record
>of mental instability. Once again, Joe, you are caught in another
>one of your conflations.
Reply posted to exi-freedom@yahoogroups.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:09 MDT