# \pi2\pi

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Thu Aug 02 2001 - 12:44:22 MDT

-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Cordian <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net>
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com
Subject: Pi

Interesting article recently posted on the Nature Web site about the
normality of Pi.

"David Bailey of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California and
Richard Crandall of Reed College in Portland, Oregon, present evidence
that pi's decimal expansion contains every string of whole numbers. They
also suggest that all strings of the same length appear in pi with the
same frequency: 87,435 appears as often as 30,752, and 451 as often as
862, a property known as normality."

Of cryptographic interest.

"While there may be no cosmic message lurking in pi's digits, if they are
random they could be used to encrypt other messages as follows:

"Convert a message into zeros and ones, choose a string of digits
somewhere in the decimal expansion of pi, and encode the message by
adding the digits of pi to the digits of the message string, one after
another. Only a person who knows the chosen starting point in pi's
expansion will be able to decode the message."

While there's presently no known formula which generates decimal digits of
Pi starting from a particular point, there's a clever formula which can be
used to generate HEX digits of Pi starting from anywhere, which Bailey et
al discovered in 1996, using the PSLQ linear relation algorithm.

If you sum the following series for k=0 to k=infinity, its limit is Pi.

1/16^k[4/(8k+1) - 2/(8k+4) - 1/(8k+5) - 1/(8k+6)]

(Exercise: Prove this series sums to Pi)

Since this is an expression for Pi in inverse powers of 16, it is easy to
multiply this series by 16^d and take the fractional part, evaluating
terms where d>k by modular exponentiation, and evaluating a couple of
terms where d<k to get a digit's worth of precision, yielding the (d+1)th

Presumedly, if one could express PI as a series in inverse powers of 10,
one could do the same trick to get decimal digits. Such a series has so
far eluded researchers.

--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:01 MDT