RE: capitalist religion (was: NANO: _Forbes_ cover story)

From: Randy Smith (
Date: Wed Jul 18 2001 - 09:27:38 MDT

>From: "Mitchell, Jerry (3337)"
>To: "''"
>Subject: RE: capitalist religion (was: NANO: _Forbes_ cover story)
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:26:10 -0400
>The biggest hurdle I cant get past personally is this majority rule thing.
>Why does 51% of the population get to hold the magic excalibur and wield
>total control over the other 49%? What principle allows this and what
>supports it? No, I dont have the alternative, but me not haveing the answer
>doesnt mean that this is the best we can do... I never said I was a genius,
>but it doesnt take a 200 IQ to grasp basic principles and know when your not
>following them. Rather then trying to answer back to this with the usual
>screaching of being practicial, try to think of a way to make the principled
>approah the only practical solution, then you will have done more for

>freedom then any government program could have ever done.


And indeed in SOME matters govt/the public does NOT simply abide by 51% majority:  you have certain "rights" and ultimately these rights derive from the fact that you as an intelligent, and therefore potentially very destructive entity DEMAND certain unalienable rights. 


Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:49 MDT