Re: Debunk All Religiosity Equitably (D.A.R.E.)

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2001 - 07:48:20 MDT


From: "Olga Bourlin" <fauxever@sprynet.com>
> That was a rhetorical question, of course. But from what I've read, Bertie
> was not very respectful or tolerant of woo woo (superstition in all its
> guises), and that was to his credit.

Right, he authored the classic: _Why I'm Not A Christian_, an excellent primer
on debunking religiosity. (Decided to change Subj. heading from "equally" to
"equitably" since some forms of religiosity require more debunking than
others.)

> I respect anyone's right to woo woo, too, but I think it's koo koo ...

Good for you. Bertie proved it's cognitive doo doo, too...

©¿©¬

--J. R.

Useless hypotheses, etc.:
 consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, CYC, and ELIZA

We won't move into a better future until we debunk religiosity, the most
regressive force now operating in society.
http://www.kartoo.com/cgi-bin/k.cgi?q=virtropy&l=0&m=1



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:44 MDT