CONC Re: Sorry (in retrospect)

From: Michael M. Butler (
Date: Thu Jul 12 2001 - 15:27:40 MDT


"J. R. Molloy" wrote:
> > ...arguing that revealing who was responsible
> > really would have been the right thing to do.)
> >
> > Lee
> Quite so, for it would also have eliminated the suspicion (that some list
> participants may have harbored) that there was actually no culprit to lynch
> because the incident was contrived. I'm not saying it was contrived,
> understand, just that revealing the identity of the accused would have
> deflated any suspicion that it was.
> Stay hungry,
> --J. R.
> Useless hypotheses, etc.:
> consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
> analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, CYC, and ELIZA
> Everything that can happen has already happened, not just once,
> but an infinite number of times, and will continue to do so forever.
> (Everything that can happen = more than anyone can imagine.)
> We won't move into a better future until we debunk religiosity, the most
> regressive force now operating in society.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:44 MDT