Re: Debunk All Religiosity Equally (D.A.R.E.) ->Obfuscational incomprehensiblist?

From: Joe Dees (
Date: Wed Jul 11 2001 - 16:03:38 MDT

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) > "J. R. Molloy" <> <> Re: Debunk All Religiosity Equally (D.A.R.E.) ->Obfuscational incomprehensiblist?Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:45:37 -0700
>From: "Robert Coyote" <>
>> Since I don't truly understand the question "Do you believe in God" because
>> God in this statement is undefined, and asking for a definition seems to
>> only obfuscate further,
>> what could I call myself if I simply think it is an incomprehensible
>> question?
>A non-theist?
An analytic or ordinary language philosopher, such as Ludwig Wittgenstein and Gilbert Ryle.
>Stay hungry,
>--J. R.
>Useless hypotheses, etc.:
> consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
>analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, CYC, and ELIZA
>We won't move into a better future until we debunk religiosity, the most
>regressive force now operating in society.

Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL! compares book price at 41 online stores.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:43 MDT