Re: TECH: wireless gets real

From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2001 - 08:31:25 MDT


Right. Note that I was talking about _repeaters_, not splitters. I am guessing they don't *do* repeaters per se.

Brian D Williams wrote:
>
> >From: "Michael M. Butler" <butler@comp-lib.org>
>
> >Seems like repeaters would have to be pretty broadband &
> >sophisticated in that topology, if they are practical at all. Am
> >I 'way off base?
>
> Actually in a PONs network the splitters are a passive device that
> can split off the individual wavelengths (Lambdas) essentially just
> a sophisticated prism, they require no power.
>
> Brian
>
> Member:
> Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
> National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
> SBC/Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:42 MDT