Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Wed Sep 27 2000 - 23:14:10 MDT

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Classism (was Re: Why would an AI want to be friendly)"
Previous message: Eugene Leitl: "single-molecule STM chemistry"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Samantha Atkins writes:

> If it is postbiological enough then survival of the fittest and "food"
> and "eating" may be quite irrelevant.

Not if postbiological critters will replicate imperfectly in face of
limited resources. Which seems a rather safe bet. Darwinian evolution
is really astonishingly basic.

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Classism (was Re: Why would an AI want to be friendly)"
Previous message: Eugene Leitl: "single-molecule STM chemistry"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:39:17 MDT