Re: OpenMind Project at MIT

From: Zero Powers (zero_powers@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 21:51:03 MDT


>From: James Rogers <jamesr@best.com>

>I (and many others, I'm sure) see a lot of problems with this methodology.
>Basically, it is a really bad implementation of CYC. Before the whole
>MindPixel thing became a media sensation, I tried to see if I could get a
>good explanation from McKinstry regarding how he was going to solve some
>of the hard problems that aren't resolved by his design, since he was
>constantly touting it over email. I didn't get much more than some vague
>handwaving, which I assumed meant that some real issues weren't even being
>addressed and at which point I pretty much dismissed the whole "mindpixel"
>thing.

I could be wrong, but I don't think even McKinstry expects his project to
ever "wake up" and become sentient. At best it'll be just a huge database
of consensus human "common sense." No, that does not an AI make. But it
certainly seems to me to be a database that might one day prove *very*
valuable to a newly sentient AI who is very curious about the way humans see
the world, no?

-Zero

Learn how your computer can earn you money while you sleep!
http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=38158

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:38:28 MDT