Re: GUNS: Why here?

From: David Lubkin (lubkin@unreasonable.com)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 21:51:46 MDT


On 9/12/00, at 2:45 PM, hal@finney.org wrote:

>Corey asks,
>> What exactly IS the relevance of the gun discussion to Extropianism?
>
>I think many contemporary issues have great relevance to Extropianism,
>not only guns, but abortion and drug policy as well.

As long as it doesn't dominate the list, I think discussion of
contemporary issues is essential.

Hal raises long-term concerns, viz., if society cannot adequately
cope with easy issues like guns, abortion, and drugs, how will they
cope with the far messier problems that will follow?

Which is a great reason to talk about them. But there's a bigger one
as well: The legal precedents and social climate surrounding these
commonplace problems can directly affect us *now*.

Gun policy directly affects whether I will live, no less than medical
technology. Will a wacko be armed? Can I be armed, to defend myself?

Drug policy directly affects whether I can buy nootropics or unapproved
life-extending meds.

As life-affirming as I am, I want the right to commit suicide, if only
to increase the likelihood that I could be frozen upon deanimation
without autopsy.

-- David Lubkin.

______________________________________________________________________________

lubkin@unreasonable.com || Unreasonable Software, Inc. || www.unreasonable.com
a trademark of USI:

> > > > > B e u n r e a s o n a b l e .
______________________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:50 MDT