In his page
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/PCR.html
Daniel Ust wrote:
My point is not to show that we must embrace skepticism to escape
foundations, but only to illustrate that pancritical rationalism cannot
answer the skeptic. I believe other philosophies can answer the skeptic,
but only ones that provide a system that goes further than
pancritical rationalism allows.
A very good point.
I wonder (just wonder) if Chaitin's "positive" extensions
of Godel's and Turing's theorems may be useful.
Or, perhaps, a mixture of Chaitin's "thermodynamical"
epistemology and the constructivist (or 2nd order
cybernetics) approach....
scerir
A very good article, written by Gregory J. Chaitin, is
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/vienna.html
Constructivism
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CONSTRUC.html
http://english.pusan-e.ac.kr/~THIS/Knowing_Without.htm
http://www.online-education.ch/course/Seiten/lesson2.htm
http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/~elmurphy/emurphy/cle2.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:40 MDT