Re: Do we differ more on values or facts?

From: Jason Joel Thompson (jasonjthompson@home.com)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 15:21:23 MDT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stirling Westrup" <sti@cam.org>

a Popperian falsificationist. To me, facts are predictive theories
> about outcomes of experiments which have been tested and have so far
> failed to be disproved. As far as I am concerned almost nothing matches
> your criteria for a fact, since nothing non-trivial can be proven true,
> and it is thus not a useful definition.

Well spoken. From what does Popperian falsificationism derive?

--

::jason.joel.thompson:: ::founder::

www.wildghost.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:22 MDT