> I don't know whether I'd go so far as to call myself an NLPer, but I've
> found the concepts to be some of the most useful of all the intangible
> tools I possess.
Yeah, personally and professionally, I've found NLP to be one of the most
personally-extropianistic, ie, it's taken me better and beyond who I was
prior to discovering it!
I can actually attribute 2 job promotions to my NLP skills! In addition,
my love life is a masterpeace! And of the 10 or so job interviews I've
done in the past year, I've been offered all but 2 jobs!
In an earlier post you seemed to be associating Richard
> Bandler's work with things spiritual. Perhaps he's gone down other paths
> since I studied NLP several years ago, but I would have classified his
> work as scientific rather than spiritual (as your earlier post implied).
In my opinion Richard has gone into some more spiritual domains,
particularly since he started having Robert Anton Wilson co-teach at most
of his seminars! However, he certainly is very scientific, having a
background in Chemistry, Math, and Physics!
- Eric
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Studios/6605/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:21 MDT