By the way, this message was a reply to Phil Osborn. Sorry Phil, thanks for
the response, and I wont forget to attribute your stuff next time!
Emlyn
> > >From: "Emlyn O'Regan" <emlyn@one.net.au>
> > >Subject: Re: Teleoperation
> > >Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 18:44:47 +1000
> > >
> > >All this talk of "humbots"; horrible.
> > Yeah, I thought it was an ugly term, myself, just couldn't come up with
> > anything off the cuff that was less ambiguous. BTW, I didn't find
> anything
> > to disagree with in what you say, so I almost didn't respond. But, then,
I
> > thought, should I only reinforce disagreements?
> >
>
> Good effort! That's probably a first for this list. Thanks!
>
> I think a lot of people post good things here, and are discouraged by
being
> ignored. I've come to the conclusion that it usually means people agree
with
> you. I think I'll try to actually tell people ths more often.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:12 MDT