Re: NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) as an Extropianistic Tool!

From: Steve (steve@multisell.com)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 13:28:59 MDT


Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:57:16 -0500
From: Barbara Lamar <shabrika@juno.com>
Subject: Re: NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) as an Extropianistic Tool!

On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:56:26 -0400 (EDT) stdnt428@hampshire.edu writes:

> Are there any other NLPers on this list!?!
>
> Please make yourself known, and share your thoughts on
> Extropianistic-Lingusitic Programming uses!

>Hey Eric,

>I don't know whether I'd go so far as to call myself an NLPer, but I've
>found the concepts to be some of the most useful of all the intangible
>tools I possess. In an earlier post you seemed to be associating Richard
>Bandler's work with things spiritual. Perhaps he's gone down other paths
>since I studied NLP several years ago, but I would have classified his
>work as scientific rather than spiritual (as your earlier post implied).

>I'll be glad to post more about NLP if anyone on the list is interested,
>or to talk about it offlist.

>Barbara

An interesting aside is that some people consider Henry Pelham's work
(Pelhamism)
from the 1950's to be identical to the later NLP (Bandler & Grinder's
systematising
of Perl's & Ericksons work plus another couple of influences).

What do others think? I use bits of NLP technique in thereapy when I feel it
is appropriate,
but don't consider myself an NLP practitioner.

www.steve-nichols.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:54 MDT