Re: innumeracy

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 23:08:20 MDT

Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Scientology (was: Re: Limits of tolerance)"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: innumeracy"
In reply to: Spike Jones: "Re: innumeracy"
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: innumeracy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 09:02 PM 27/08/00 -0700, Spike wrote:

>STAY BACK, Police Dog.

>they should know that dogs cant
>read.

Of course they can read. How else could Police Dog have signed his name?

Damien Broderick

Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Scientology (was: Re: Limits of tolerance)"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: innumeracy"
In reply to: Spike Jones: "Re: innumeracy"
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: innumeracy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:40 MDT