Re: GUNS: Re: Brady law has not affected homicide rates

From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@turbont.net)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 08:11:28 MDT


Brian D Williams wrote:
>
> From: "Zero Powers" <zero_powers@hotmail.com>
>
> >>From: Brian D Williams <talon57@well.com>
>
> >>Here's a thought: "Why is it that in Chicago handgun crime is
> >>fairly common despite the fact that they banned handguns over 18
> >>years ago, yet the surrounding suburbs where handguns are legal
> >>have almost no handgun crime?"
>
> >Gee I don't know. Could it be that Chicago has a fairly large
> >population of less-than-gainfully-employed, poorly educated,
> >drug-abusing people with less than ideal family backgrounds, while
> >the same is typically true to a significantly lesser extent in the
> >'burbs?
>
> Sarcasm aside, you are basically correct. The people involved in
> gun crime don't follow laws, so anti-gun laws are 100% ineffective.
> Illinois has licensing, instacheck, waiting periods, and in
> addition Chicago has a 19 year ban on handguns.... completely
> ineffective.

Especially when the Chicago cops are supplying most of the illegal guns.

>
> Give me a map of Chicago and I could outline some areas in red,
> others in yellow. As long as you never ventured into these areas
> you would never see a gun or hear a gun shot.

And any Chicago cop can tell you the same info, because the areas Brian talks
about are the areas they sell guns in.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:35:33 MDT