Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?

From: Emlyn (onetel) (emlyn@one.net.au)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 07:30:31 MDT


RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?In a pop sci book I was reading on genetics recently, the author claimed that the positive effect of genetic engineering techniques on combating heritable diseases will be dwarfed by the recent increase in the mixing of the people of the world because of increasing globalisation. Apparently most genetic diseases have a local & recessive character; increased outbreeding leeds to far smaller incidence of recessives pairing up, so a large over-all drop in the incidence of such disease.

Emlyn
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jonathan Reeves
  To: 'extropians@extropy.com'
  Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 11:12 PM
  Subject: RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?

  Actually inbreeding is quite good as long as you outbreed every few generations to weed out the genetic weaknesses

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Replicant00@aol.com [mailto:Replicant00@aol.com]
  Sent: 01 July 2000 16:28
  To: extropians@extropy.com
  Subject: Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?

  In a message dated 7/1/2000 7:39:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
  goldengarden@arjang.mail.telia.com writes:

> What has improving the stock got to do with keeping it white,
> Caucasian or european?
>

  yes good point

  Inbreeding as far as I know causes more deterioration than good.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:33:52 MDT