Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?

From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Sun Jul 02 2000 - 10:35:20 MDT

Next message: scerir@libero.it: "Re: more national missile defense"
Previous message: Robin Hanson: "Re: Mating Mind (was: Diamond, Miller, Gould, Darwin)"
Next in thread: altamira: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Reply: altamira: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Reply: Eirikur Hallgrimsson: "Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Maybe reply: Jonathan Reeves: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Maybe reply: Jonathan Reeves: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 05:24 PM 7/1/00 PDT, Zero wrote:

>>Inbreeding as far as I know causes more deterioration than good.

Living below one's genes is no threat to the Greens.

>Who's calling for keeping stocks white?

I want an outer sheath, like a mullato warm bronze
with eyes a glimmering—hair a shimmering sterling.

Natasha

Next message: scerir@libero.it: "Re: more national missile defense"
Previous message: Robin Hanson: "Re: Mating Mind (was: Diamond, Miller, Gould, Darwin)"
Next in thread: altamira: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Reply: altamira: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Reply: Eirikur Hallgrimsson: "Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Maybe reply: Jonathan Reeves: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Maybe reply: Jonathan Reeves: "RE: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Improvement( was)Is Eugenics Really A Bad Thing?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:33:49 MDT