Dave Sill wrote:
>I'm tired of being dominated by my hormones. I waste vast amounts of
>time and energy thinking about and having sex, and I'm constantly
>being distracted by sexual thoughts. Sometimes I think it would be
>better--now that I've sired all the children I plan to--to just get
>out of the sex game altogether. (I'm 39, married, three children.)
Considering that the human male sex drive is the product of millions of years of natural selection-governed evolution, I'm always hesitant when someone considers trying to tamper with it. Objectivists would consider feelings of beneficence and altruism to be similarly distracting; I would counsel against trying to eliminate them chemically.
Plus, how does your wife feel about your intentions to artificially rid yourself of your sex drive?
Such feelings are, admittedly, a legacy of our evolutionary history, and as such are possibly not ideally suited to our current technological society. However, I would sooner adapt society to match our evolutionary psychologies, rather than trying to change our psychologies to match the demands of our society.
J. John Bloch