Tim wrote:
> I take your point, but it doesn't doesn't work in this case as the total
> number of goods is specified.
>
> Even if the 5% of goods are free, the entire other 95%, can't be above the
> average price.
>
Negative pricing?
That's where I'm shopping from now on!
Emlyn
> >> Try parsing this sentence
> >> "95% of goods in the shop were above the average price of goods in the
> >> shop"
> >>
> >> make sense?
> >>
> > Yep. 5% of the goods are really cheap (the stuff that I buy).
>