Re: Nanorgasm

Eric Ruud (
Thu, 22 Apr 1999 19:09:17 -0700

You have the right person now, but you don't have me pegged right. I never said I disliked sex. I love sexual pleasure, as anyone who knows me can attest.

I just dn't think that we need to assume that that which surpasses all other forms of pure, instantaneous pleasure in our lives today will necessarily be such 50 years from now.

It's easy to become married to the thought of sex as such as it's pretty well built in to our biology, but let's just have a little bit of vision here!


-----Original Message-----
From: Gina Miller <>
To: <> Date: Thursday, April 22, 1999 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Nanorgasm

>Okay Scott, my apologies, thinking back on it now, it may have been
>Eric. Sorry. Do you forgive me?
>>Gina wrote:
>>> It's strange that we are defending sex, I won't dare to ask Scott
>>> or how he developed his attitude toward it, but your ripping
>>> off!
>>Gina, what are you talking about? What attitude are you referring
>to? Are
>>you sure you're not confusing my posts with someone else's? I can
>>you, no one needs to defend sex to me. I'm quite the proponent,
>thank you.
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit