Today, by the unconstitutional laws that have soiled the law books of
our country, "law enforcement", or shall we say, "illegal government law
enforcement" agencies have some legally defined un-Constitutional powers
to conduct illegal searches and monitoring of private individuals. This
is, as stated, un-Constitutional, as well as: un-American, cowardly,
base, "snoopy", ugly, un-American, and downright Orwellian.
Now, I don't have any kind of problem with constitutional law
enforcement only to the extent of protecting individual and civil
liberties, ie, within its Constitutional domain. Anything else is not
only not Constitutional, but base, cowardly, et al, as above.
Privacy, to some extent, is a right. It is a right because of the
consideration of some personal data as "owned". For example, if my name
was Joe B. Katzenhammer-Bulwar Jr., and somebody started sending e-mails
using my name to spam people, that would be a violation of my
The ability to aquire and use strong encryption to protect the integrity
of personal data over the Internet is thus, by extension, a right.
There are issues with national security with respect to encryption, but
that has absolutely nothing to do with illegal wiretapping and
un-Constitutional, unethical, communications interception, and the fact
that those things are illegal, unethical, and un-Constitutional.
Back to "law enforcement in regards to un-Constitutional electronic
communications privacy invasions", or shall we say, "goons", there is a
absolutely no legitimate reason to circumvent the tried and true warrant
and Miranda laws that assume the Consitutional "innocent until proven
guilty." Thus, current government operations in these regards is
un-Constitutional, thus illegal, and makes these government agencies
civilly and criminally liable for said invasions of privacy.
Acoording to the Freedom of Information Act, which might
Ross F.
-- Ross Andrew Finlayson 202/387-8208 http://www.tomco.net/~raf/ "C is the speed of light."