Tony Hollick latest post is, as usual, full of errors, I list a few of them
below but I only glanced at it so I don't claim it's anywhere near complete.
>All this [ Heisenberg's] 'observationalist' stuff is positivist old
>hat and can be demolished quite readily. We can _retrodictively
>correct_ the observation results.
No you can not, not readily and not at all
>>Planck's constant is constant
>Wake up man -- it's a ratio!
Could you please explain why a ratio can not be a constant.
>Not [the speed of light is constant] according to Richard Feynman
>in Quantum Electrodynamics.
Dead wrong, Richard Feynman never said anything that stupid in his life.
>Not according to observation.
A statement without a particle of fact.
>Neither Special nor General Relativity have given science or
>technology anything it didn't have anyway.
Spectacularly wrong.
Tony says a lot more stuff but I lost interest, correcting his other bloopers
I will leave as a exercise for the reader.
John K Clark johnkc@well.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQCzAgUBNXIe7n03wfSpid95AQFG3ATvaGAHT5q1OF7cckFF3w+DWq7/a+4/NeSB
IvKfz+IVKZ0+pfn+gTATmsIrGEYoeMo4JSu4P0i4XGAYKiXnUUAuF7PTlaKMP4TO
AuHBMPJetKjtp79WjxDPS30wwfr2M/OZRVksamB9fPHpnxeyPP8WV7asSBmRQaqr
T05eb7VO4t8N98NW7vngjEq4kpssm+ThjazNf/90XUlO2bxaUN8=
=1UsK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----