Re: S/N (yeah, again)

Eugene Leitl (
Sun, 3 May 1998 16:32:54 +0400 (MSD)

Yak Wax writes:

> I agree. Frankly I find you all terribly boring and hold many of you
> in utter contempt. But now and again among the S/N ratio moans, posts

A classical case of the pot calling the kettle black.

> about grammatical errors and authors promoting new books, there's a
> brightly shinning gem. And it's those ideas I'd like to see
> encouraged. Luckily most of the good ideas come from a few main
> sources (some of which aren't me!)


> So is anyone interesting in setting up an invitation-only list?

Too late. Has already occured.

> Choosing new list members would be the job of those already chosen by
> whomever wants to organise it. Maybe a web site could be set up for
> viewing (after the list member's controversial ramblings have been
> edited for public consumption) or an edited digest version sent out to
> the less fortunate non-members. We could also invite some "big names"
> in science, technology, art and (even) politics.

Of course.

> I would get an invitation for having the idea, of course.

Of course.

Good bye,

P.S. As my current workload has increased and the majordomo now seems
to be working I think I will bow out now -- thanks again to all
low-noise participants.

I would be very thankful is somebody of the transhumantech
participants would bounce any relevant material to