What?! I interpret this to mean that you can subscribe to what people
call "legal systems" and still be an anarchist. If I'm wrong, tell me.
My point, based upon what I understand anarchism to be, is that if you
subscribe to a "legal system" created by another, you are not an
anarchist. As an anarchist you are advocating a return to the state of
nature (which may or may not be a good thing).
I have to admit that IMO, anarchism is not the be-all and end-all of
human existence. Hobbes' Leviathan convinced me of that years ago. But I
do want to hone my views. Please, anarchist apologists, convince me
you're right.
-- Hagbard CelineAbsolutely and definitely not a clerk of the nostalgia of the declining ruling class.