I think anyone who puts any thought at all into the nature of reality and
epistemology will go through some dark nihilistic stage... angst, I
guess. I know I did. Realizing the fact that this is an angst suffered
by basically anyone who has thought about life is not so commonplace. I
would have appreciated a teacher telling me that philisophical angst was
normal back in high school. I don't think getting over this angst
necessarily means forming some new philosophy that claims to find the
"truth", it simply requires that you except that no knowledge is sacred or
a foundation except for the existence of self. It can be a comforting
thought when you think of how much bullshit there is in the memes sent to
you every day by the media. It's nice to know that everyone could be
"wrong," that it all could be a big dream... I find that more comforting
than the "truth" some religions will sell me.
Re: progress....
I think you are measuring progress using the religious sense of
the word, that we are finding more and more "truth" and this will somehow
allow us to understand the universe in some divine way. I see progress as
the increase of *useable* information, and I don't see why there needs to
be truth except for those who don't have the strength to exist with
criticizable, temporary beliefs. In science, there are models to explain
phenomena, but no one claims that those models are a direct
representation of reality, they are simply a tool that we find useful in
analyzing and using the workings of the universe. They are an
approximation, and sometimes a very bad one. I see no problem with this,
science is not a religion, it is not about beliefs, science is simply a
tool.
geoff.