RE: CRYO: "Ischemia" vs. "Reversibly dead"

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 17:55:57 MDT

Next message: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: ERRATA: Last nights NOVA/FRONTLINE special"
Previous message: Max More: "Paper on technology trends for business"
In reply to: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: CRYO: "Ischemia" vs. "Reversibly dead""
Next in thread: Ralph Lewis: "Re: CRYO: "Ischemia" vs. "Reversibly dead""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de wrote,
> "Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" wrote:
> > Cryonics patients are DEAD.
> As to calling patients "dead" let's agree to disagree.

I prefer the term "legally dead", which implies maybe not medically dead, or
the phrase "dead by today's standards", which implies that this might not be
considered dead in the future.

--
Harvey Newstrom <http://HarveyNewstrom.com> <http://Newstaff.com>

Next message: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: ERRATA: Last nights NOVA/FRONTLINE special"
Previous message: Max More: "Paper on technology trends for business"
In reply to: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: CRYO: "Ischemia" vs. "Reversibly dead""
Next in thread: Ralph Lewis: "Re: CRYO: "Ischemia" vs. "Reversibly dead""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 10:00:01 MDT