Guess they've never heard of a preliminary injunction, contempt of
court, trespassing, grand theft, "rustling," cruelty to animals,
civil damages, etc. More likely they don't give a damn.
On 22 Mar 2001, at 14:23, Michael Lorrey wrote:
> It is. They've had the sheep in quarrantine for months now, and the
> owners have an appeal date coming up in a month. The USFDA was
> apparently so worried about the validity of its case that it intends to
> destroy the sheep before the court date to present a fait accompli.
> John Marlow wrote:
> > Sounds rather Machiavellian--but not out of the question, certainly.
> > Damned stupid way for them to go about it, though.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:42 MDT