Re: SPACE: Is ISS a boondoggle?, was Re: SPACE: Why so much EVA onISS?

From: Spike Jones (
Date: Tue Mar 20 2001 - 20:55:36 MST

"Robert J. Bradbury" wrote:

> So one has to ask -- is the potential loss of life involved
> in the exploration of space "overpriced"?
> I for one suspect that there are people who would sign up
> to be Astronauts if the profession were 10x, 100x, perhaps
> even 1000x riskier. The question is what each level of
> additional safety is costing us? Robert

It may come as a surprise to some, but in exploration and
war, one definitely hangs a pricetag on human life. One area
where this is most apparent is in military actions involving the
United Nations, for each nation puts a *different* price on
the heads of their soldiers. This pricetag determines how
the soldiers are equiped for battle.

This is a topic I *almost* stumbled into during my posts
on privately funded space exploration, for a private
organization may accept higher levels of risk than
NASA. Remember that *all* astronauts are volunteers.
Furthermore, we have volunteers taking crazy risks, just
for the hell of it: such as climbing Mt. Everest, where the
chances of perishing are more than 10%. In some years
the death toll has exceeded 20%, yet off they go. spike

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:42 MDT