Steve Nichols wrote:
> >1. The probability that we will never become posthuman is approximately
>This builds in too many assumptions. I for one think we already
>*are* posthuman, but not all of us realise it.
>Nick seems to follow the "posthuman must be entirely alien" school
>of thought ....
I'm using the standard definition of "posthuman". (See "The Transhumanist
>But logically I feel Nick is *wrong* ... since he fails to omit 4. That we
>could be the ancestors leading the original lives on which any future
>simulations are based!!!!!
I show that 4 has negligible probability.
Department of Philosophy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:40 MDT