('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
>Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 17:45:24 -0500
>From: Michael Lorrey <email@example.com>
>Subject: JOE DEES: Misrepresentation of previous messages
>Joe Dees wrote:
>> >Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:48:00 -0500
>> >From: Michael Lorrey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> >To: email@example.com
>> >Subject: Re: GUNS: Misrepresentation of previous messages
>> >Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> >Joe Dees wrote:
>> >> I said:
>> >> >
>> >> >And I was not the one who brought up the subject of duelling either, I
>> >> >was responding to an earlier poster on that, so once again, not only is
>> >> >Joe Wrong, but so is Harvey.
>> >> >
>> >> And whose post might THAT one be, ayy, Mikey? One of your droogies?
>> >So not only are you a liar, but you are computer illiterate? I bring to
>> >your attention the following message (apologies in advance to Gene for
>> >ratting on him):
>> > Message-ID: <3A959E3B.47EB0231@datamann.com>
>> > Date:Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:18:19 -0500
>> > From: Michael Lorrey <email@example.com>
>> > Organization:Datamann, Inc.
>> > To:firstname.lastname@example.org
>> > Subject:Re: The recent election (was Re: Heston's
>> >Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de wrote:
>> >> Brian D Williams wrote:
>> >> > I'm curious as to what you saw that was unfair about the election.
>> >> An admission that a measurement has an error, and the realization that
>> >> a measurement without an error bar wouldn't survive even a trace of
>> >> peer scrutiny. That apart from the obvious cases of "candidate A won"
>> >> or "candidate B won" or "candidate C won" there's also "within the
>> >> error margins, we can't tell, so it's a tie", and a procedere for
>> >> resolving such. As flipping an unbiased coin, or a public duel,
>> >> or whatever.
>> ><<AND HERE IS THE CRITICAL TEXT^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> >Apologies accepted in advance, except for from Joe.>>
>> >> Apart from that, anything with a "democracy" somewhere in it is supposed
>> >> to represent the meaning of majority of voters. Not representatives of
>> >> such, or some d'Hondtian games with numbers. Not to open the can of
>> >> worms of basis democracy vs. elitism...
>> So, I was right, by your own evidence; your droogie Brian brought up duelling, and eugene and I elaborated upon it, Eugene ribbing Gore and I ribbing Bush, at which time Brian, who brought up duelling in the first place, attempted to blame his own actions on me. Kinda like the black helicopter Freemen types blaming the feds for NcVeigh's demolition of the OK city federal building. The modus is the same; first do something, then blame those you did it to, and accuse THEM of doing what YOU did.
>So you prove that you are computer illiterate. Any idiot can see that it
>is Eugene that brought up the duelling topic. Brian just made a one line
>comment about his curiosity.
>I'm still waiting for an apology from you, Joe.
It may indeed be the case that I missed a > in the exchange, however, I will not accept your word for it, or any alterable cyberevidence you or your posse may present. I do not know WHO you are, but you have more than amply demonstrated to me WHAT you are, and you would have to rise inestimably in my opinion to deserve my contempt.
Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:39 MDT