Re: COMP: Breeding a Better Engine

From: Doug Jones (random@qnet.com)
Date: Sun Jun 18 2000 - 13:56:24 MDT


Ken Clements wrote:
>
> Doug Jones wrote:
> >
> > Of course, evolution can't make major breaks with past art. No amount
> > of Diesel engine design evolution will give you a Stirling cycle.
> > Design does have its place.
>
> But evolution did give us the Stirling engine.
> -Ken

How so? If you're putting forth the squirrel case that Robert Stirling
was himself a product of evolution, well then *everything* made by
humans is a product of evolution. A tautology of zero value. BTW, the
stirling cycle was invented long before the deisel cycle, 1816 vs 1892.

--
Doug Jones
Rocket Plumber, XCOR Aerospace
http://www.xcor-aerospace.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:13:40 MDT