Re: PHIL: Egoism (Was ART: What Art Is)

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Mon May 29 2000 - 04:23:40 MDT


In a message dated 5/28/2000 11:36:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
daniel.fabulich@yale.edu writes:

>
> The feeling is there. At a minimum, the altruism is there (in the
> normal sense of the term, not Ayn Rand's contrived version). How
> could you tell the difference between these characters and characters
> who loved each other fully?

Sigh.... If that's love, baby... I can tell you, I'd hate to be with any of
those cold fish....

Besides finding that kind of "love" a truly boring relationship, I dont want
to get into what I think of her hero worshop requirements surrounding men.
Rand, Brandon, Barbara, her husband... really creepy stuff... plus her ideas
about sex. It's all to dreadful and terrible and adolescent and
frightening...

At this time I'd like to politely excuse myself... I think there's someone
across the room who wants to talk about cumina, pelagia and nudibranches...
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:11:52 MDT