Re: Northern Ireland (was Re: Nanotech Restrictions)

Date: Wed Apr 26 2000 - 08:14:14 MDT

In a message dated 4/26/2000 7:07:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, writes:

> Then there ain't no white Australians ...

No, nor are there really many white (or black or Asian) 'Americans'. You
could be white and *part* native American, if one of your distant ancestors
was Indian.

> The Unionists are Irish by your definition ... and non-native, by your
> previous definition. Which do you want to use?

Again, it's clearly a question of native by birth (in this case you can be a
Native New Yorker and be Jamaican) or by heritage. I understand the
difference, why would you pretend not to?

Perhaps the word indigenous would make it clear to you.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:50 MDT