Re: molecular drive

From: Gina Miller (nanogirl@halcyon.com)
Date: Sat Apr 15 2000 - 23:54:26 MDT

Next message: phil osborn: "Re: STOCKS: An unnerving thought"
Previous message: phil osborn: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in2050)"
In reply to: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: molecular drive"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I want them.
Nanogirl....

> I just wrote a (class) paper and have about 60 references
> on selfish DNA (mostly transposable elements and population
> genetic models), including abstracts and some comments.
> I'll send them to anybody who wants them.

Next message: phil osborn: "Re: STOCKS: An unnerving thought"
Previous message: phil osborn: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in2050)"
In reply to: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: molecular drive"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:21 MDT