Re: those NRA Australian statistics examined

From: Damien Broderick (
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 10:14:04 MDT

At 08:51 AM 10/04/00 -0700, Lee wrote:

>Are these "corrections" deliberately misleading, or are you just being
>sloppy with language? Do you think you can get away with "rate of
>increase dropped..." on a list full of mathematicians?

Why are you asking me?

As I said at the top of the cut&paste post you're responding to,

>Here's something from an Oz site, posted March 25 this year

I thought people here might be interested to see what some of those in
Australia who objected to the NRA ad had to say. Please take it up with them.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:12 MDT