On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 08:26:45AM -0400, Michael S. Lorrey wrote:
> Not so. Foreign companies cannot have anti-trust actions brought against
> them, only US based companies can be charged with such 'crimes'.
Uh-huh. Then the EU anti-trust investigation into Microsoft must be
Most other countries have _tougher_ anti-trust laws than the US. The
EU and the DOJ had a "gentleman's agreement" not to duplicate effort
while one of 'em was investigating -- now that MS has been found guilty
in the US, the EU investigation is rolling ahead.
(Oh, and then there's the French investigation. _That_ one is dynamite --
the charges are extremely serious and typically carry prison sentences
for the directors of companies found guilty under them, because the
French charges aren't about anti-trust -- they're anti-FRAUD, and they
allege that Microsoft defrauded the French government. Oops ...)
> Especially if MS has no actual offices left here, they are merely an OEM
> supplier to PC makers and software distributors, or they just distribute
> over the ineternet. Foreign traders can only be charged with anti-trust
> crimes if they are American citizens or American based corporations, or
> the American based divisions of foreign corporations.
Microsoft occupies a similar monopoly position in the rest of the world,
if not a tighter one -- and typically charges more for its software.
> Now, Bill would be dumb to fire all of his employees, however buying an
> island and developing it for use by as many of his current employees
> that want to move there, then simply subcontract the rest who want to
> stay in Redmond, would be rather easy.
And put him outside NAFTA and the EU, making him vulnerable to import
duty and other taxes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:12 MDT