Re: Nanotech Restrictions (was: RE: Transparency Debate)

From: Harvey Newstrom (
Date: Sat Apr 08 2000 - 15:48:03 MDT

"Adrian Tymes" <> wrote on Saturday, April 08, 2000 3:38
> I've been working on a system that seems similar - perhaps you could
> tell me if it is?
> I call it "enlightened greed", and it is driven by the principle that
> the correct action is that which will benefit me most in the long term.
> The important thing is that nowhere in the decision is there
> consideration of what would be good or bad for anybody else,

Wouldn't this system lead to mass criminal behavior? If I am a skilled
hacker, then I can make money easier by stealing it than by working as a
consultant. According to your system, that would be best for me. Does your
system lead to this conclusion?

Although I can't think of a logical "proof" that I "shouldn't" steal from
other people, I still choose to increase value in my lifetime rather than
decrease it. I do not want to increase my personal gain, if it reduces the
total value in the world. I rather sell a valuable service for money rather
than defraud my customers. I'm not sure how or why this attitude should be
incorporated into an ethical system, but I still make this choice.

Harvey Newstrom <>
Certified Consultant,  Legal Hacker, Engineer, Research Scientist, Author

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:09 MDT