In a message dated 4/2/00 2:22:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
retroman@turbont.net writes:
> Without truly universal coverage, the purported benefits of the system
> for fighting crime are greatly diminished, and I don't see the point of
> creating such a system and such a confiscation of human rights unless
> these benefits are secured. Without the full benefits, the cost-benefit
> of the liberty-security transfer is not to the advantage of the
> individual.
How does requiring cops to video-record their interactions with citizens a
"confiscation of human rights"? How is that "not to the advantage of the
individual"?
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
ICQ # 61112550
"We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
-- Desmond Morris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:01 MDT