Dan Fabulich wrote:
> I really have to disagree here. MWI DOES give a better
> explanation of the existence of randomness: it
> demonstrates that what appears random isn't, and
> explains why it would appear random anyway. What more
> would we want from such an answer?
You’re right; although the description you quoted from the Many-Worlds FAQ is of (what I would call) subjective uncertainty rather than indeterminacy. And therein lies my own confusion.