Re: >H Sexbots

Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:33:23 -0600

At 05:41 AM 3/11/99 -0500, jonkatz@slashdot.org wrote:

> But here's a
>futuristic vision that's a far surer and troubling bet than e-sex:
>sexbots.

> Why take the risk when your sexbot is waiting to
>meet your needs?

Interesting play on Sexpot. This term will at least take the focus off female servicing -- for it to be 21st Century, the services need to cover both genders.

Natasha
Natasha Vita-More: http://www.natasha.cc Transhumanist Art Centre - Home of Extropic Art: http://www.extropic-art.com **NEW** Transhuman Culture InfoMark: http://www.transhuman.org PRESS RELEASE: "We are transhumans ..." Meme Orbits Saturn in 2004!

"The best defense is an aesthetic offense."