Re: Spam
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:13:08 EST

In a message dated 2/3/99 12:16:33 AM Central Standard Time, writes:

> The cost could

> be trivial by most standards, yet quite high for spammers (at
> least on a level with junk mail).

Now there's something.

I like it. And it would definitely shut the toliet seat on porn spam.

Portage Indiana