I wrote:
>There's no "right" or "wrong" way to construct a bridge, say? We can
>achieve our purposes in any arbitrary fashion?
Samael replied:
>Sorry, I thought we were talking about morals
We were, but you did write: "There is no 'right', 'wrong', 'valid', 'invalid', 'good', 'evil' EXCEPT within moral systems_" (emphasis mine).
Was that a slip of the pinkie, then?
Dick