Re: HIV=/=AIDS video
Enigl@aol.com
Fri, 7 Mar 1997 00:11:42 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-03-05 13:26:52 EST, you write:
<< >The existence of risk-group-specific AIDS-defining diseases in the
absence
>of HIV challenges your assertion. >>
Not at all. It just means HIV is one but probably not the only. Look at
HTLV -1 and HTLV-2 and probably some CMV, etc. The definition of AIDS is not
satisfied by the non-HIV infected people since the CD4+ at <= 0.3 and
declining is not their. The skeptics add every non-AIDS disease up from
"0.0" to CD4+ 1.0 that should not be in the AIDS group at all.
Davin C. Enigl, (Sole Proprietorship) MEAS
President-Microbiologist
Microbiology Consulting, Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Points (HACCP), CGMP, and Validations
for the Food, Cosmetic, Nutritional Supplement, and Pharmaceutical Industry
enigl@aol.com
http://members.aol.com/enigl/index.html
March 6, 1997
8:11 pm