I hear him talk five to seven years ago at Stanford, and thought it
was cool then; still do. But there was a pretty negative review in
Science in the last month or so.
>only children apparently are less constrained. (Yay! Guess what I
>am.) ... Immortal, slowly growing populations could retain looseness
>even if the adults themselves didn't, through the only children.
I think you must be assuming that most people are too conservative.
This isn't supported by Sulloway (nor contradicted). Maybe such
populations would be too loose.
Robin D. Hanson hanson@hss.caltech.edu http://hss.caltech.edu/~hanson/